Issue - meetings

Full Committee Report 18_03030_FUL 321 Chase Road (South Point House) AJH - Final

Meeting: 25/06/2019 - Planning Committee (Item 87)

87 19/01204/RE4 - BLISS HOUSE , 1 HOLBROOK CLOSE, ENFIELD, EN1 4UL pdf icon PDF 8 MB

RECOMMENDATION: That planning permission be granted, subject to conditions

WARD: Chase

Minutes:

NOTED

 

1.    The introduction by Gideon Whittingham, Principal Planning Officer, highlighting the key issues and clarifying the proposals.

2.    Both items 5 and 7 were presented and considered together.

3.     Following investigations by the Council in 2018, it was identified that the cladding system on Bliss House, Purcell House and Walbrook House was not appropriate for buildings of their height and type in respect of fire safety.

4.     Following investigations by the Council in 2018, it was identified that the cladding system on Bliss House, Purcell House and Walbrook House was not appropriate for buildings of their height and type in respect of fire safety.

The Council immediately committed to removing the existing cladding system and install a new long-term replacement external wall insulation system for the exterior of the blocks.

These applications are submitted as a result of this decision.

5.    Officers’ responses to points raised.

6.    Members’ debate and questions responded to by officers.

7.    The support of the majority of the Committee for the officers’ recommendation: 8 votes for and 1 abstention.

 

AGREED that planning permission be granted, subject to conditions.


Meeting: 21/05/2019 - Planning Committee (Item 27)

27 18/03030/FUL - 321 CHASE ROAD (SOUTH POINT HOUSE) AND 2-14 CHASE SIDE, LONDON, N14 6JT pdf icon PDF 4 MB

RECOMMENDATION: That planning permission be granted, upon completion of the legal agreement.

WARD: Southgate

Minutes:

NOTED

 

1.    The introduction by Andy Higham, Head of Development Management, highlighting the key issues, clarifying the revised proposals, and confirming the careful consideration given to all issues of concern raised.

2.    Members’ attention was drawn to the update circulated ahead of the meeting which addressed typographical errors, but looking at the merits of the planning application it was considered that the recommendation to approve was correct taking into account adopted policy and the circumstances of the site.

3.    The deputation of Dan Maier (Extraordinary Design).

4.    The response of Laura Dimond (Agent).

5.    Officers’ responses to points raised.

6.    Members’ debate and questions responded to by officers.

7.    The support of the majority of the Committee for the officers’ recommendation: 5 votes for, 4 votes against and 1 abstention.

 

AGREED that planning permission be granted, upon completion of the legal agreement.