Issue - meetings

An issues paper prepared by the Opposition Group is attached for information.

Councillor David Skelton introduced the Opposition Priority Business paper on the Future of Whitewebbs which contained a number of recommendations.

Councillor Skelton highlighted the importance of Whitewebbs Park to residents and the importance of preserving the natural environment, improving the quality of life in the borough and, crucially, maintaining trust in those who govern the Council.

Concerns were expressed that the proposal for the future use of Whitewebbs by Tottenham Hotspur Football Club (THFC) would not permit Whitewebbs to be fully open to the public. It was noted that there were strong concerns over the lack of suitability of THFC to run the park as it has not demonstrated competence or experience in running a public space. Further, it was felt that the payments of £2m over 25 years would not offer a good return for the Council.

It was alleged that the engagement with residents had been poor, and this impacted on the public’s confidence in the Council’s ability to involve local residents, particularly as there had been no public consultation in the bidding process. There was a criticism that a statutory notice had been posted on the back of a toilet door and that consultation had commenced just before Christmas.

Councillor Caliskan acknowledged that there will be some residents who will wish to object to any plans for Whitewebbs because they believe the golf course should have remained open, regardless of the cost to the taxpayer. Councillor Caliskan advised that the Council is seeking a future for Whitewebbs golf course that is financially sound but equally enhances the green space, maintains the beautiful woodlands, and increases access for more Enfield residents.

It was suggested that Whitewebbs park is one of the most important public spaces in the borough and is a hub of biodiversity for 78 species of birds, ancient woodlands, and a variety of plants but that the renovation of the park would require major earth moving and re-landscaping which would have a negative impact on the biodiversity.

In response, members noted that the proposals would allow for the re-wilding of Whitewebbs park and investment in the woodlands. Despite the Whitewebbs woods being excluded from the lease, the responsibility of improving, paths, fences, and bridleways is part of the proposal. This would make the park more accessible for walking, cycling and horse riding as well as providing jobs and opportunities for the residents of Enfield and investment in grassroots sport for young people across the borough.

During the debate, a procedural motion was moved by Councillor Sabri Ozaydin and seconded by Councillor Chris Dey under paragraph 13.20 (viii) of the Council’s Procedure Rules to extend the debate for a further 15 minutes which was put to the vote and AGREED.

Following the extended debate, a procedural motion was moved and seconded under paragraph 13.20 (v) of the Council’s Procedure Rules that the question be now put which was put to the vote and AGREED.

Councillor Caliskan said that the Administration would not sign the lease  ...  view the full minutes text for item 6