The Committee received a report
from the Director of Law and Governance outlining details of a
call-in received on the decision taken by the Leader of the Council
on the Meridian Water Station, Public Realm Place
Making.
NOTED that this report was
considered in conjunction with the information in the part 2
agenda.
The Chair invited Councillor
Smith to outline the reasons for call-in. It was noted that this
discussion was held in public under the part 1 section of the
meeting.
Councillor Smith outlined the
reasons for calling in the decision:
- The
report provided was not clear in some respects and although
responses had been provided to the reasons for call-in – not
all points had been covered. However, he said the level of
reporting was improving.
- Concern that the estimate for the cost of works had increased
substantially and that the costs had not been properly reported at
the call-in meeting in September 2018.
- That
the estimated cost of the project appeared to have risen by 62% in
four months, which he now estimates to be £3.9million. A cost
breakdown had been prepared by Councillor Smith which gave what he
considered to be an estimate of total scheme costs. He had sought a
detailed cost breakdown from officers, which had subsequently been
provided by them and which had been included in the agenda
papers.
- The
decision to award the design and works contract to a single
contractor -Volker Fitzpatrick was taken after a failed procurement
and a renegotiated contract, when the original Master Developer
procurement was abandoned. Earlier concerns had been given that the
lack of a competitive procurement process for the scheme might lead
to significant increase in costs which, he felt, was now
apparent.
- Further clarity was needed regarding the cost estimate for the
scheme - what fees have been included and maintenance expenditure
expected.
Councillor
Levy, reminded everyone that calling-
in a decision was not a mechanism to satisfy curiosity as this
could be achieved by other means, for example by having discussions
with officers and asking for further information.
He invited Councillor Caliskan
to respond to the points raised by Councillor Smith.
The response of the Leader of
the Council, Councillor Caliskan. She highlighted the
following:
- The
decision to call-in this report was a waste of members and officers
time. Four reports relating to Meridian Water have been called-in
which could have been resolved by members discussing issues of
concern with officers or with the Chief Executive or
herself.
- As set
out in the ‘Response to reasons for call- in’ the
latest Delegated Authority Report (DAR) provides a full and
complete break down of the costs which
show that there has not been an increase in costs. The correct
figure for the works is £3.5 million which is within the
original estimates given at the previous Overview and Scrutiny
Committee in September. This reflects the VolkerFitzpatrick contract works at £3m and
£500k on other packages.
- The
sequencing of the Meridian Water contract meant that it was crucial
for VolkerFitzpatrick, the appointed
contractor, under a Preconstruction Services Agreement (PCSA), to
complete the public realm works within timescales. At the meeting
of Overview and Scrutiny Committee on 27 September 2018 all
political parties agreed to allow the original decision to approve
the works to the public realm adjacent to the new railway station
on Meridian Way to be confirmed. There have been no substantial
changes since that time.
The following issues/ questions
were raised:
- Peter
George said he would be happy to spend time with Councillor Smith
explaining any issues of concern he may have regarding the Meridian
Water project. Partnership working with
Network Rail and LB Enfield is ensuring delivery of the new station
for Meridian Water on time and on budget. The Council is supported by Stace LLP
(Construction & Property Consultancy) as Project Managers and
Cost Consultants. They have confirmed that the total budget price
of £3.5m represents value for money.
- Councillor Hockney referred to the Part 1 report which referred
to an indicative cost for the delivery of the public realm work
which was undertaken using external cost consultants, in Autumn
2016. At that time a figure of £750K was identified for
design and £3.25m for construction work. He asked for
clarification on this. An explanation
was given that figures given at this time were for high level works
and gave a worse- case scenario. The works have come in under
budget. The original authorisation was
necessary for a PCSA with VolkerFitzpatrick to enable the planning
application submission. The logistics
meant It was necessary to do this to ensure the work comes in on
time, ready for the station opening, May 2019.
- It
would not have been possible to undertake works needed through a
traditional tender process within the timeframe. It could have led
to delays and increased costs. Councillor Hockney referred to Stace
LLP confirmation that the estimated price was value for money. It
was stated that comparisons are undertaken with cost documents used
and comparing rates. There is a rigorous process in
place.
- Councillor Caliskan said members have a choice whether they want
to refer the report back. This could however result in delays to
the project and public realm works not being ready in time for the
station opening. It could also lead to higher costs.
Councillor Smith summed up by
saying that he was entitled to question decisions where it is
apparent that there appears to be unjustified cost increases. Since
the last call-in on this subject in September 2018 the figures
given seem to show a 65% increase. He
understood that under the original plans for the project the main
contractor was going to pay for the new station but that this was
no longer the case.
The Chair stated that
Councillor Smith had made assertions and answers had been given and
costings provided. The Chair reminded
Councillor Smith that he can seek clarification from officers, or
the Leader and request items come to Scrutiny.
Overview & Scrutiny
Committee considered the reasons provided for the call-in and
responses provided and having considered the information provided
the Committee agreed to confirm the
original Portfolio decision:
1.
Authorises the expenditure to complete public realm
related works identified in the Part 2 report
2.
Authorises the delegation to the Meridian Water
Programme Director to place smaller packages of work to those
packages as set-out in the Part 2 report
3.
Authorises VolkerFitzspatrick to deliver the works by
variation of existing agreements as set out in the Part 2
report
Councillors Levy, Akpinar,
Aramaz, Susan Erbil and Jewell voted in
favour of the above decision. Councillors David-Sanders and
Hockney abstained.
Following this item Councillor
Lee David-Sanders left the meeting and Councillor Smith took has
place on OSC.